The Future of Abortion

CAL THOMAS COMMENTARY MAY 30, 2019

         THE SUPREME COURT WILL LIKELY BE FORCED TO RE-VISIT ROE VS. WADE AS MORE STATES ARE PASSING LAWS EITHER RESTRICTING THE PROCEDURE OR ALLOWING IT IN THE MOST EXTREME CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING FOR REASONS OF RACE, GENDER AND POSSIBLE DISABILITY.

         THE LATTER IS CALLED EUGENICS AND IT WAS THE PHILOSOPHY OF MARGARET SANGER, FOUNDER OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD, AND ADOLF HITLER, WHO WAS A FAN OF SANGER. BOTH FAVORED A MASTER RACE OF WHITE PEOPLE.

         THE COURT THIS WEEK UPHELD PART OF AN INDIANA LAW REQUIRING ABORTED BABIES TO BE DISPOSED OF LIKE OTHER HUMAN REMAINS, BUT IT REFUSED TO ADDRESS THE OTHER PART OF THE LAW FORBIDDING ABORTIONS FOR REASONS OF GENDER, RACE AND DISABILITY. JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS RIGHTLY NOTED THAT LEAVES THE DOOR OPEN FOR THE COURT TO REVISIT THE ISSUE, WHICH IT IS LIKELY TO DO AFTER THE NEXT ELECTION.

         THAT SCENARIO IS ENHANCED BECAUSE MANY STATES ARE PASSING NEW LAWS, SOME RESTRICTING OR OUTLAWING ABORTION AND OTHERS REMOVING WHAT FEW RESTRICTIONS ARE LEFT, ALLOWING FOR THE KILLING OF BABIES WHO SURVIVE AN ABORTION. IT LOOKS LIKE A SLOW LEGAL PROCESS, BUT IT OFFERS PRO-LIFERS A LOT TO PRAY FOR. I’M CAL THOMAS.